Governance vs. Management: Policy Governance® model can help Directors “get out of the weeds.”

For more than two decades now, I have been observing the election, development, conduct, and decision-making processes of nonprofit governing boards. My interest in how boards govern (or don’t) has increased to the point where the characteristics of elected leaders has become more interesting to me than ever before. I share these interests with many senior association professionals. Closely connected are my observations of board-staff relationships, primarily because these are the key success indicators relative to AMG’s successful service to clients.

Recently, at a session of the American Society of Association Executives (ASAE) annual meeting, we discussed observations on governance versus management among nonprofit organizations. Our discussion on why boards exist did not demean the passion, energy, and commitment of board members. Those of us in the profession know Board members to be very intelligent, experienced people as individuals. Yet as John Carver, author of Boards That Make a Difference states, “sometimes boards tend to be incompetent groups of very competent individuals.”

In our ASAE session, we spent a good amount of time discussing Carver’s Policy Governance® Model (www.carvergovernance.com) and concluded that one central reason a board exists is to be accountable for the efficiency of its association. The board is where all authority and accountability resides. And yet, so many boards do not understand governance and instead involve themselves at various levels in management and operations.

I like Carver’s model because it doesn’t make room for board members to involve themselves in the operations of the organization. Instead, boards should be strategic thinkers with the long term health of the organization in mind. To do this, boards employ a CEO or Executive Director to report on the operations of the organization. Through this executive figure, Carver asserts that boards need (1) to be definite about its performance expectations, (2) to assign these expectations clearly, and then (3) to check to see that the expectations are being met.

To achieve a harmonious board-staff relationship--and ultimately succeed as an organization--boards should demand organizational achievement in a way that empowers the staff, leaving to their creativity and innovation as much freedom as possible. This is a question of what and how to control, but it is equally a question of how much authority can be safely given away. Carver argues that the best guide for the board is to give away as much as possible, short of jeopardizing its own authority.
Board members should no longer be recruited based on their having skills that mirror the skills of staff. Policy Governance® seriously asserts that boards be visionary and provide long term leadership. Boards must persevere in describing purpose and ethics/prudence boundaries. Forming clear policies from those values is far harder than telling the staff how to do its job. Board members must be experts in governance, not management.

Carver’s Policy Governance® model provides an alternative for boards unhappy with the amount of reactivity, trivia, ritual and management they are involved in and are seeking to be truly accountable. But attaining this level of excellence requires that a board breaks with traditions and preference to manage and embrace governance. The model offers a challenge for visionary groups determined to make a real difference in tomorrow's world. That is why those of us in the business of association management believe Carver’s model has much merit.

CAEs More Attractive in Executive Searches

I recently returned from a recruiting trip for an executive director for one of AMG’s association clients. Interviewing potential candidates with a task force comprised of board leaders, I am reminded of the importance of the Certified Association Executive (CAE) designation. Participating in many, many executive searches for various clients over the years, I have seen that the success of an association depends on the leadership embodied by a true association professional.

For the few that may be unfamiliar, the Certified Association Executive (CAE™) program is designed to elevate professional standards, enhance individual performance, and designate association professionals who demonstrate the knowledge essential to the practice of association management. Earning the CAE credential is the hallmark of a committed association professional.

Indeed the successful candidate from this recent search has worked toward the CAE credential. The American Society of Association Executives (ASAE) maintains recognition among board leaders, members, and those involved in hiring nonprofit professionals including executive recruiters and association HR directors as one benefit of successfully completing the program. I agree that the program makes candidates for executive association positions more competitive. As I assist and lead searches for association leaders, I value resumes that come across my desk with the CAE designation and will continue to do so. True association professionals are ideal candidates for managing associations in my book.

If you are interested in becoming a Certified Association Executive, check out more detailed information from ASAE.